Your business is already exposed to AI risk
If staff are using ChatGPT, copilots, document summarisation tools, or AI-assisted workflows – formally or informally – your business already has a governance, data protection, and regulatory exposure issue.
Sindri designs, governs, and embeds AI systems that stand up to regulatory scrutiny, board questioning, and client due diligence.

If you’re here, it’s probably because...
Staff are already using ChatGPT or AI tools at work
There is no formal AI policy or governance framework
No one can clearly explain how AI data is handled
You could not confidently answer regulator, auditor, or client questions about AI usage

Your business is already using AI through staff tools and informal experimentation. Without governance, this creates exposure to data breaches, regulatory issues, and reputational damage.
Sindri replaces uncontrolled AI usage with governed, auditable systems designed specifically for regulated financial and professional services firms.
This is not general AI consulting. this is Sindri.
We work exclusively with regulated businesses where AI failure is not an option.
Sindri operates at the intersection of legal governance, data science, and software engineering – ensuring AI adoption is deliberate, defensible, and regulator-ready from day one.
Exposure Assessment
AI usage, risk, and governance gaps identified
Governance
Design
Policies, controls, approvals, accountability
Secure Implementation
AI systems built within defined boundaries
Ongoing
Oversight
Risk reviewed as regulation, tools, and behaviour evolve

How Sindri measures AI exposure
Every Sindri engagement – from the AI Maturity Score to board-level programmes – assesses your firm across four measurable dimensions.
Strategy
Is AI adoption happening deliberately, or by default through staff behaviour and tools?
Governance
Could you defend your current AI usage to a regulator, auditor, or client – in writing?
Automation
Where are manual processes increasing cost, delay, or error – and where would automation reduce risk, not increase it?
People
Are staff using AI safely and consistently – or improvising without guidance?
Who stands behind Sindri’s advice
AI governance decisions don’t just affect systems – they affect regulatory exposure, client trust, and board accountability. Sindri is led by senior specialists who have signed off risk in regulated environments.

Jersey Advocate, former Chief Legal Officer, and Chartered Governance Professional. Advises boards on AI governance, regulatory alignment, and defensible operating models.

CFA charterholder with advanced training in mathematics and statistics. Designs and deploys AI systems for regulated financial services environments.

Senior software engineer specialising in translating regulatory and governance requirements into secure, production-ready systems.
Before AI becomes a regulatory question, assess your AI exposure
Confidential. Designed for regulated firms. No obligation.
